If Ali Had not Been There, Umar Would Have Been Ruined
The great theologian, Ganji Shafii, in Chapter 57, of his Kifayatut-Talib Fi Manaqib Ali Bin Abu Talib, after narrating some authentic hadith, reports from Hudhaifa Bin Yaman that "one day Umar met him and asked him: What was your condition when you awoke in the morning?
Hudhaifa said, I rose in the morning hating the Truth, liking mischief, bearing witness to the thing unseen; learning by heart the uncreated, reciting salutations without being in the state of ritual purity, and knowing that, what is for me on the earth is not for Allah in the Sky.
Umar was infuriated by these remarks and intended to punish Hudhaifa when Ali came in. He noticed the signs of rage on Umars face and asked why he was so angry. Umar told him, and Ali said: There is nothing serious about this remark: What Hudhaifa said was correct.
If Ali Had not Been There, Umar Would Have Been Ruined
Truth means death, which he detests; mischief means wealth and children, which he likes; and when he says he bears witness to what he has not seen, this means that he testifies to the oneness of Allah, death, the Day of Judgement, Paradise, Hell, the bridge over it named Sira, none of which he has seen.
When he says he learns by heart what is uncreated, this refers to the Holy Quran; when he says that he recites salutations without ablution, this refers to reciting salutations on the Prophet of Allah, which is permissible without ablution; when he says he has for himself on earth what is not for Allah in the sky, this refers to his wife, as He has no wife or children.
Umar then said, Umar would have been lost had Ali not arrived." Ganji Shafii says that Umars statement is verified according to reports of most of the narrators of hadith. The author of Manaqib says that Caliph Umar repeatedly said: "O Abul-Hasan! (Ali). I would not be a part of a community without you." He also said: "Women are unable to give birth to a child like Ali."
Muhammad Bin Talha Shafii in his Matalibus-Suul and Sheikh Sulayman Balkhi Hanafi in Yanabiul-Mawadda, Chapter 14, narrating from Tirmidhi, record a detailed report from Ibn Abbas at the end of which he says: "The companions of the Prophet used to seek religious judgments from Ali, and they accepted his decisions. Thus, Umar Bin Khattab said on various occasions, If it were not for Ali, Umar would have been ruined."
In religious matters and learned discussions Umar showed no vehemence. On the contrary, he admitted his own inability and acknowledged Ali as his refuge. Even Ibn Hajar Makki in Chapter III of Sawaiq Muhriqa, reporting from Ibn Sad, quotes Umar as saying, "I seek Allahs help in deciding those difficult problems for which Abu-l-Hasan (Ali) is not available."
Qazi Fazlullah Bin Ruzbahan, the fanatic, in his Ibtalul-Batil; Ibn Hajar Asqalani in his Tihdhibul-Tahdid, printed in Hyderabad Daccan, page 337; Ibn Hajar in Isaba, Volume II, printed in Egypt, page 509; Ibn Qutayba Dinawari in Tawil-e-Mukhtalaful-Hadith, page 201-202, Ibn Hajar Makki in Sawaiq-e-Muhriqa, page 78; Hajj Ahmad Afindi in Hidayatul-Murtab, page 146 and 152; Ibn Athir Jazari in Usudul-Ghaiba, Volume IV, page 22; Jalalud-Din Suyuti in Tarikhul-Khulafa, page 66; Ibn Abdul-Birr Qartabi in Istiab, Volume II, page 474; Seyyed Mumin Shablanji in Nurul-Absar, page 73; Shahabud-Din Ahmad bin Abdul-Qadir Ajili in Zakhiratul-Maal; Muhammad bin Ali As-Saban in Isafur-Raghibin, page 152; Nurud-Din bin Sabbagh Maliki in Fusulul-Muhimma, page 18; Nurud-Din Ali bin Abdullah Samhudi in Jawahirul-Iqdain; Ibn Abil-Hadid Mutazili in Sharhe Nahjul-Balagha, Volume I, page 6, Allama Qushachi in Sharh-e-Tarid, page 407, Khatib Khawarizmi in Manaqib, page 48, 60, Muhammad bin Talha Shafii in Matalibus-Suul sub-Chapter 6, page 29, Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal in Fazail as well as Musnad; Sibt Ibn Jauzi in Tadhkira, page 85, 87, Imam Thalabi in Tafsir Kafshul-Bayan, Allama Ibn Qayyim Jauzi in Turuqil-Hakim, recording Alis judgments from page 41 to page 53; Muhammad bin Yusuf Ganji Shafii in Kifayatut-Talib, Chapter 57; Ibn Maja Qazwini in Sunan, Ibn Maghazili Shafii in Manaqib; Ibrahim bin Muhammad Hamwaini in Faraid; Muhammad bin Ali bin Hasanil-Hakim in Sharh-e-Fathil-Mubin, Dailami in Firdaus, Sheikh Sulayman Balkhi Hanafi in Yanabiul-Mawadda, Chapter 14, Hafiz Abu Nuaim Ispahani in Hilyatul-Auliya as well as in Ma Nazalal-Quran fi Ali, and a host of other great ulema of your sect, with slight variation in words, have narrated Umars saying, "If there were no Ali, Umar would have been ruined."
Caliph Umars Bravery Was Never Observed On Any Battlefield
As for Umars vehemence on the battlefield, history recorded no instance of it. On the contrary, historians of both sects relate that whenever Umar encountered a powerful enemy, he took to his heels. Consequently, other Muslims also fled, and the Muslim army was often defeated.
Hafiz: You have gradually increased the unkindness. You have insulted Caliph Umar, who was the pride of the Muslims and in whose age the Muslims achieved great victories. Because of Umar, Muslim armies won their battles. You call him a coward and say that he ran away from the battlefield and that the defeat of the Muslim army was due to him! Is it proper for a man of your caliber to defame Caliph Umar?
Well-Wisher: Im afraid you are mistaken. Though you have been with me for many nights, you have not understood me. Perhaps you think that it is due to enmity that I criticize or praise men. It is not. There is a great liability in religious debates, which has been a source of antagonism among Muslims for centuries. Such debates often excite malicious tendencies, which are not in accord with the injunctions of the Holy Quran.
The Quran clearly says: "O ye who believe! Avoid suspicion as much (as possible): for suspicion in some cases is a sin." (49:12) You assume that my statements are motivated by malice. The fact is otherwise. I have not uttered a word contrary to what your own ulema have written. You have just said that I have insulted Caliph Umar.
But there was not the slightest indication of an insult. What I said corresponds to the records of history. Now I am constrained to give a clearer view of facts in order to quiet this antagonism
